Custody Cases No Longer an
Easy Win for Mom
Many of the custody cases that went through the court system
in seventies and eighties were mere formalities. While
fathers were given equal opportunity to defend their
eligibility as a custodial parent, the general perception was
that the mother provided the most nurturing environment for the
child. This made it the mother’s case to lose, which only
occurred if she was found to be incompetent in her parenting
responsibilities. 
Much has changed since the years of these biased court
decisions. The legal world has come to understand that a
father plays a much stronger role in the development of the
child than previously accounted for. In fact, some
studies have shown that a strong male figure in the household
correlates with lower instances of risk behavior in
youths. By recognizing the importance of the father
during the custody case, the courts have changed the outcome of
many cases that would have defaulted to the mother winning custody.
Although the hearing process has become more balanced over
time, fathers can still face an uphill battle in instances
where the both parents offer similar benefits. The modern
household features two working parents who balance the
responsibilities of paying the bills and monitoring the
children. In cases like these the mother would hold an
advantage as societal influences typically lean in the mothers
favor. This brings back some of the gender prejudices
found in early custody judgments, but they generally only apply
when the separating factors are too close to differentiate.
The most common standards that apply to custody cases deal
almost exclusively with the perception of the child’s
welfare. Surprisingly however, they have very little to
do with finances. This aspect is handled through the
child support system, meaning that the parent with the highest
income would be expected to supplement more of the costs
associated with raising the kids. This obviously has no
effect on which parent they live with. What does come
into play is the safety of the primary residence, the career
obligations of the custodial parent, and any inconveniences a
child might encounter such as changing schools or homes.
These factors are often the ones that matter most in the
decision process.
The bottom line is that both parents now have equal
opportunity to win custody of their children if they can
prove their situation best meets the needs of their
development. While mothers may have an inherit
advantage in the closest cases, fathers who approach the
proceedings with adequate evidence in their favor can
certainly win a judgment. The court system has turned
their focus on custody cases to the well being of the child,
opening the doors for a more balanced debate for either
parent – regardless of gender.
|